GDP / Capita 500%, Home Price 300%
Zeppelin Real Estate Analysis Limited
1984, and based on nominal figures, Hong Kong¡¦s GDP / capita has risen 5
times while the price of a home has gone up only 3, having come down
from a peak level of around 9.
one reason that 30% or so projections of home price rises may not be
though admittedly there are many more factors that affect or reflect
upon home prices other than GDP / capita, plus the fact that Hong Kong
as a society has already passed its prime baby-boomers¡¦ household
formation stage which occurred during the late 1980s and 1990s.
most of our clients and friends are glad to hear of the possibility of such
upward price movements (and residential prices have indeed adjusted upward a
bit), yet they remain very cautious citing the still poor economy etc.
Nonetheless, we are not saying that such price rises occur due to
improvements in the economy. Instead,
looking more from a ¡¥catching up¡¦ (with the GDP / capita) angle.
As to why we think the GDP / capita has such a bearing on home prices,
consider the following:
capita has an overall high correlation with home price
= versus other seemingly factors such as nominal interest rate, supply etc
(which we found to have weak or little correlation to home price in the long
run), GDP / capita demonstrated a significant relationship to home price,
based on published information and data from government and professional
correlation between GDP / capita and home price is around 0.8, which is
= the correlation is around 0.9, ditto total GDP, and during this period,
even population seemed to have some mathematical relationship to home price.
= only GDP / Capita still demonstrates a correlation of 0.8 to home price,
GDP has gone down to 0.4, and the population factor even showed a reverse
the fact that GDP / capita correlates to home price well does not
automatically mean they have a cause and effect relationship, yet out of the
various factors, GDP / capita seems to show a more consistent relationship.
If so, then:
= Overall GDP has risen around 6 times, while GDP / capita is close to 5
times at 4.7 having dropped a bit since 1997. Home price had gone all the
way up to 9 times in 1997 and since then has dropped to 3. [See chart
started to deviate from the GDP / capita curve around 1992
= From 1984 to 1991, both home price and GDP / capita increase in more or
less the same rate, yet from 1992 and thereafter, their rates of growth (or
contraction) differ, and at times significantly, though still in the same
direction. For instance, in 1994, home price was up 6 times already yet GDP
/capita had only 4. In 1997, home price was peaking at 9, yet GDP / capita
was only 5. Now, home price is 3 while GDP / capita still hovers around 5 at
= Home price was still around 6 times its 1984 level and dropped to a
current 3, thus averaging around 14% per annum and being quite consistent at
price to increase around 33%
= Assuming the same (decline) rate of 14% is to be used for the increase, it
would take a bit more than 2 years to reach the target of 4 from the current
3. Naturally, one may argue that the rate of growth (if any) may not be the
same as the rate of decline, and we are not predicting that it would be so,
just that such relatively symmetrical up and down had been observed in the
1996 to 1998 period.
summarize, we do not know if the home price fluctuation will return to being
more matching with GDP / capita (as in the 1984 to 1991 period), or it will
stay less matched as in recent years, either way
there is a
chance for prices to catch up with the GDP level,
in particular if confidence returns a bit and market sentiment improves (as
to how these are drummed up is another topic). As for further decrease in
home price, this is a possibility that will happen later if some of our
internal economic structures including skills mismatch etc do not get
addressed or resolved.
note GDP / capita is not a perfect measure, though it does in part reflect
the earning power of an economy, which in turn affects the asset prices
including real estate. Also note that while the GDP / capita has stayed the
income structures and wealth distribution patterns might be changing in
Further investigation is required.
The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only
and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due
diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates,
consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or
liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or
reference to the content contained herein.
to Home /
Back to Simple to Read Stuff Section