| 
    Higher Home Ownership, Lower Home Price Stephen Chung Managing DirectorZeppelin 
    Real Estate Analysis LimitedMay 2007
	 
	Yes, at least 
	that is what the USA statistics in 2000 appear to suggest and yes, it goes 
	against the instinct of most. 
	Many people would have thought a higher home ownership rate would mean 
	generally a higher home price compared to places with lower home ownership 
	rates. And why not, they might ask. Higher home ownership rates mean, given 
	all things being equal, households are eager to become their own landlords 
	and thus are keener to buy. This in turn pushes up demand and potentially 
	prices. Nonetheless, this is not what the data indicates.  Your humble 
	author has no definite answer or theory to explain this, and does not rule 
	out the possibility of randomness i.e. it just so happens that in 
	2000 the statistics show thus. A learnt and experienced economist would be a 
	better choice. In any event, here are the overall results and 
	observations (based on data contained in
	
	www.dataplace.org):  
	A)    
	We have 
	looked at 51 states in the USA 
	and compared the typical home prices of these states to their various 
	economic-social attributes including average income, poverty rate, 
	population density (so many people per square mile), vacancy, and yes, home 
	ownership rate.  
	  
	B)    
	Home price 
	and average income 
	= the factor with the highest correlation among the ones mentioned is 
	average income. The R is 0.79 and the R2 is 0.62, and this is statistically 
	significant. Curiously, we have done similar studies on other places outside 
	of the USA and on different periods of the USA, and the observations are 
	quite similar. Most of the time, income factors such as GDP per capita, 
	household income, income per capita, and the like, are quite correlated with 
	home prices, whereas factors such as mortgage rates and so on come and go, 
	i.e. they may appear to correlate during certain (usually shorter) 
	timeframes but in the long run do not seem to matter much.  
	  
	C)    
	Home price 
	and home ownership rate 
	= the issue here is not that these are uncorrelated. They are although not 
	to the extent which price and income show. BUT the surprising angle (to 
	many) is that these two are negatively correlated! NOT ONLY is the 
	instinctive ˇ§higher ownership rates mean higher home pricesˇ¨ not being 
	overly true, it appears to be somewhat false! Home prices are higher in 
	places where home ownership rates are lower. The R is (0.67) and the R2 is 
	0.45.  
	  
	D)    
	Home price 
	and population density 
	= a higher population 
	density means, given all factors being the same, the pressure on land (use) 
	is higher, and thus, the price for land and real estate could be higher than 
	a place with similar-sized but less crowded population. This means while 
	population density may be a necessary condition, it is NOT a sufficient 
	condition by itself in terms of causing or leading to higher home prices. In 
	fact, the R is relatively weak at 0.37 and the R2 is 0.14. 
	  
	E)    
	Home price 
	and vacancy rate 
	= usually these two go the opposite way to one another and they do here, 
	though not really in a big significant way. The R is (0.28) and the R2 is 
	0.08. This appears to imply while a high vacancy does exert some pressure on 
	home (and real estate) prices, its impact is NOT significant or proportional 
	e.g. using $1M as basis, 10% vacancy, $900K; 20% vacancy, $800K, and so on. 
	  ˇ@ 
	F)    
	Home price 
	and poverty rate 
	= these two are similar to (E) but are even less significant. While places 
	with high poverty rates tend to have lower home prices, the link is very 
	weak. That is, some places with high poverty rates will also see high home 
	prices. Poverty as a factor or aspect does not appear to have much influence 
	on home prices. The R is (0.23) and the R2 is 0.06.  
	 The 
	above offers food for thought 
	= sometimes popular instincts and notions could be wrong and misleading. 
	Authorities preferring high home ownership rates and (thus) steady home 
	prices may wish to reconsider the thesis. 
    Notes: 
    The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only 
    and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due 
    diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates, 
    consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or 
    liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or 
    reference to the content contained herein.                                
     
    
	
     Back 
    to Home  /   
	Back to Simple to Read Stuff 
    Section |