| 
    Market Price 
	Level and Comparative Prices 
    
	Stephen Chung
    
     
    Managing Director
    
	Zeppelin Real Estate Analysis Limited
    
    
    May  
    2004 
    
     
        Often 
		people think 
        that the real estate prices of a certain neighborhood or district will 
		increase when and if certain infrastructural facilities, be these roads, 
		subway stations, or even prominent schools, are planned and developed. 
		This seems logical as the quality of the neighborhood is enhanced, so 
		will its real estate prices. However, actual observations may differ and
        what sounds logical may not always ring true. A major reason for 
		the somewhat half truth is that many people do not (or cannot) 
		distinguish the difference between (the more macro) market price level(s) 
		that a certain large market sector / economy can command / sustain and 
		(the more micro) comparative prices that exist among different 
		properties within a certain neighborhood. 
    Factors 
	that affect the macro market price level 
    are generally economic-social-administrative-political ones, such as 
	economic performance (as indicated by GDP etc), productivity, cost of money 
	(real interest rate), overall knowledge and skill sets, global competition, 
	demographics, and the like. Building a road or a railway station here and 
	there may or may not imply the betterment of the economy as a whole i.e. it 
	depends. For instance, New York City with its relatively high income 
	households implies that its overall real estate market price level will be 
	relatively high globally and nationally, under-priced or over-priced though 
	this may be at times, but never considered cheap. Half a million US$ for any 
	modest and up is not a surprise. Likewise, Hong Kong with is US$23,500 GDP 
	per capita cannot expect prices to be so affordable that every Tom, Dick, 
	and Harry (or Jane, Mary, and Rose) can enter the private residential 
	market. Having an average HK$2M (US$250,000) price tag is not a crime. That 
	is to say, economies with low GDP per capita and productivity cannot sustain 
	an overly high real estate price level for long, foreign wealthy investors 
	notwithstanding.    
    On the more 
	micro level, 
	and using the residential sector as an example, a project that offers more 
	convenience by way of shopping, entertainment, transportation, and the like, 
	is more likely to be better received than ones that do not offer the same 
	convenience, given all things being equal. Yes, a project with good access 
	say to the subway sells better most of the time. Nonetheless, these 
	advantages do not guarantee that the prices of the better project will not 
	drop IF macro factors turn for the worse. For instance, say a better project 
	can sell for HK$5,000 per square foot of floor area when times are good and 
	other less advantaged residences can only obtain HK$4,500. Now assume the 
	economy turns for the worse and our better property can now fetch only 
	HK$4,500 per square foot. The less advantaged properties will now probably 
	for around HK$4,000 (or to the mathematically minded HK$4,050). The premium 
	gap between the better property and the other ones is kept yet it does not 
	save the better property from having decreased selling prices. Whatever 
	infrastructural amenities that it has over the others do not help very much.
    
     The 
	above leads to the question  
    of when to 
	consider macro factors and when to take into account the micro aspects. When 
	investors are eyeing a certain market or sizable market sector, macro 
	factors count for more. It is not quite useful to see if a school would add 
	to the appeal of a project prior to assessing if in fact the market in which 
	the project is part of makes investment sense. Only when investors have 
	decided to enter a certain market or sector does detail investigation into 
	the micro aspects bear logic. Notes: 
	The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only 
	and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due 
	diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates, 
	consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or 
	liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or 
	reference to the content contained herein. 
    
	 Back 
	to Home  /   
    
	Back to Simple to Read Stuff Section |